Most fit-out firms don’t stall at £10m because they can’t win work, they stall because cash and control break first. The fastest route from £5m to £15m is not “more tenders” or “more supervisors”. It’s four hard limits you run the business by, pipeline cover, live job concurrency, pricing guardrails, and weekly commercial control that forces variations and valuations through on time. Read this and you’ll know the exact numbers to set, and the stop rules that protect margin while you scale.
Quick answer
Set four numbers and run the business to them for 12 to 18 months, 3x pipeline cover (about £45m live to land £15m), a hard cap on live projects based on your PM and QS ratios, margin guardrails that force you to walk away from bad tenders, and a weekly control rhythm that gets variations notified within 48 hours and valuations certified first time. Default rule, don’t add sites until your commercial control is ahead of the work, not chasing it. Only break that rule if you have cash headroom and a named person who owns the extra site control.
- Keep 3x qualified pipeline cover at all times, if the pipeline drops, stop bidding low and start fixing lead sources.
- Cap concurrency using simple ratios, start at 1 Project Manager per 2 live jobs and 1 QS per 3 live jobs, then add work only when the stop rules are met.
- Run a weekly control meeting per job and enforce two time limits, variations notified within 48 hours and valuations submitted with evidence every time.
In this guide
Build a lead engine
£15m turnover comes from pipeline coverage, not from pricing more tenders.
Think of your workload like a vending machine. You don't get sales by shaking it. You get sales by filling the right slots and keeping them full every week. Your "slots" are your lead sources. Your "stock level" is live, qualified opportunities.
- Lead engine
- A repeatable system that creates, qualifies, and progresses opportunities to award, with weekly activity targets per lead source.
- Pipeline cover
- Total value of live opportunities you are actively working, divided by your turnover target. For fit-out growth planning, use 3x cover.
- Tender
- Your priced offer to do the work, including scope, exclusions, programme assumptions, prelims, and commercial terms.
- Prelims (Preliminaries)
- Time-related site costs like site supervision, welfare, access, temporary protection, temporary electrics, hoarding, and set-up. They burn every week the programme runs.
3x cover is the number that stops desperation bidding. To land £15m in the next 12 months, you need about £45m of live, qualified opportunities if you win 1 in 3. Carry only £15m to £20m in the pipeline and every lost job forces you into rushed tenders, squeezed prelims, and taking programme risk you cannot price.
Allocate the £45m across three sources
Three lead sources beat ten because each source changes margin, conversion speed, and hassle. But "use three sources" is useless without a target split. Here is one that works for a £15m fit-out contractor growing from a repeat-client base:
| Source | Pipeline target | Avg. job size | Opps. needed (live) | Why this weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Repeat clients & occupiers | £18m (40%) | £600k | 30 | Cleaner scope, faster decisions, higher win rate (~45%) |
| Design team referrals | £13.5m (30%) | £900k | 15 | Pre-qualified, clearer design intent, good margins |
| Main Contractor packages | £13.5m (30%) | £1.2m | 11 | Volume, but harder prelims and tougher variation recovery |
That gives you roughly 56 live opportunities at any time. The repeat-client slice is heaviest because those jobs convert fastest and protect margin. If your business leans more on Main Contractor work, shift the weight, but never let one source exceed 50% of pipeline or a single lost relationship blows a hole in your year.
Turn the split into weekly activity targets
A pipeline doesn't fill itself. Each source needs a weekly input that a director or BD lead can hit without cancelling delivery meetings. Here is a worked example for the 12-month plan above:
| Source | Weekly activity | Monthly result (target) | Quarterly pipeline adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Repeat clients | 5 client calls + 1 site walk | 2–3 new qualified enquiries | £4.5m added to pipe |
| Design teams | 2 consultant catch-ups (architects, PMs, CDMs) | 1–2 referral enquiries | £3.4m added to pipe |
| Main Contractors | 1 estimator meeting + 1 framework review | 1 new package invitation | £3.4m added to pipe |
Treat missed activity like a missed procurement deadline. Skip a month of consultant catch-ups and you'll feel it 10–14 weeks later as a gap in your tender list, which turns into idle labour and an empty programme slot you can't fill at short notice.
Stage-gate the pipeline so you stop lying to yourself
£45m of "early chats" is not a pipeline. Split your £45m into three bands and set a target value for each. The flow below shows how opportunities must move left to right, with a clear £ target per band:
Review these bands every Monday. The diagnostic is simple. If "priced and submitted" sags below £12m, you have a conversion problem and need to chase decisions harder. If "early chats" drops below £10m, your weekly activity has slipped and you're heading for a dry patch in Q3. Managing this split in Archdesk's pipeline view means each band updates automatically as you log tender submissions and valuations against opportunities, so the weak stage shows up the same week it opens rather than at a quarterly board review.
Make it real this week: 6-step set-up checklist
- Create three pipeline stage fields in your CRM or tracker: "Early Chats", "Invited & Scoping", "Priced & Submitted". Tag every live opportunity into one band today.
- Set £ targets per band: £15m in each of the three bands. Pin these numbers to the wall or your Monday dashboard. If any band drops below £10m, it's a red flag.
- Write a Monday review agenda (15 minutes max): (a) total value per band vs target, (b) which opportunities moved stage this week, (c) which weekly activities were missed, (d) one action per source to refill the weakest band.
- Assign weekly activity owners: name the person responsible for each source's weekly targets (5 client calls, 2 consultant catch-ups, 1 MC meeting). Put it in their diary as a recurring task.
- Add a "win theme" field to every opportunity: one line, 12 words max. Example: "We delivered their last two floors, they trust our M&E coordination." No win theme = don't tender.
- Book the first Monday review for next week: 9am, 15 minutes, same room, same three questions. The engine only works if you run it every week without exception.
Set your concurrency limit
A working lead engine fills the diary. That's the point. But a full diary without a hard cap on live sites is how fit-out firms quietly destroy themselves. Your QS gets buried, applications slip, variations go unrecorded, and the margin you won at tender leaks out through late paperwork. Before the engine delivers its first new project, you need clear capacity limits and hiring trigger points for each role.
The three capacity caps
Your maximum live projects is always the lowest of three separate caps. Each cap is set by a different role:
- PM cap = number of PMs × 2 live jobs each
- QS cap = number of QSs × 3 live jobs each
- Admin cap = (number of commercial admins × 25 applications per month) ÷ applications per live job per month
Throughout this guide we use PM = 2 jobs, QS = 3 jobs, Admin = 25 applications per month. These numbers reflect Cat B fit-out pace, where jobs run 8–16 weeks, overlap constantly, and each site generates a high volume of sub-contractor and supplier payment cycles. Longer-duration civils or new-build work might allow higher ratios. Fit-out doesn't.
Your concurrency limit is whichever of these three caps is smallest. That's the bottleneck. Adding projects beyond it means one role is overloaded, and overloaded roles cost you cash before they cost you programme.
Worked example: hiring triggers in practice
Say you run a Cat B fit-out firm with 2 PMs, 1 QS, and 1 commercial admin. Each live job generates roughly 8 sub-contractor and supplier payment applications per month.
| Role | Formula | Calculation | Cap |
|---|---|---|---|
| PM | PMs × 2 | 2 × 2 | 4 jobs |
| QS | QSs × 3 | 1 × 3 | 3 jobs |
| Admin | (Admins × 25) ÷ apps per job | (1 × 25) ÷ 8 | 3 jobs |
The bottleneck is the QS and admin, both capped at 3. That's your hard stop. Now suppose you win a fourth job. Here's how to read the trigger:
- QS trigger fires: 4 live jobs ÷ 1 QS = 4 jobs per QS. That's above the 3-job threshold. Hire a QS before you start job four.
- Admin trigger fires: 4 jobs × 8 apps = 32 applications per month. Your admin can handle 25. Hire commercial admin before you start job four.
- PM trigger does not fire: 4 jobs ÷ 2 PMs = 2 jobs per PM. Still at the threshold, not over it.
After hiring 1 QS and 1 admin, recalculate: PM cap stays at 4, QS cap rises to 6, admin cap rises to 6. Your new bottleneck is the PM cap at 4. The fifth job triggers a PM hire.
Calculator
How to use it: Plug in your real headcount and your applications-per-job figure. The calculator gives your PM cap. Compare it against your QS cap (QSs × 3) and Admin cap ((Admins × 25) ÷ apps per job) using the formulas above. Your concurrency limit is always the lowest of the three.
Find your real apps-per-job number: Pull last month's total payment applications received (sub-contractors and suppliers combined), then divide by your live job count. For example, if you processed 34 applications across 4 live jobs last month, your figure is roughly 8.5 apps per job per month. Use that number instead of the default.
The hiring decision in three checks
Run these checks every time you're about to commit to a new project. Each check uses your current live job count (including the new one) against the role threshold.
- PM check: Will live jobs ÷ PMs exceed 2? If yes, hire a PM before you mobilise. A PM running 3 fit-out jobs at once can't attend all site meetings, and missed site meetings create programme drift that compounds weekly.
- QS check: Will live jobs ÷ QSs exceed 3? If yes, hire a QS. A QS running 4+ jobs will miss variations (changes to the original scope that should be priced and claimed). On a £600k fit-out, one missed variation is typically £12k–£18k of unrecovered cost.
- Admin check: Will live jobs × apps per job exceed admins × 25? If yes, hire admin. The real-world test: can your admin turn round applications, Interim Certificates (the document that triggers payment from the client), and retention tracking inside 5 working days? If not, you're already late, and late paperwork is cash delay.
Stop rules (a strong rule of thumb)
As a rule of thumb, a new site should ideally only start when every live job has (1) a submitted valuation (your monthly claim to the client for work done), (2) a variation log agreed up to date, and (3) a cost-to-complete forecast updated for the month. If your team can't keep those three current, you're already losing margin on today's jobs.
Make it visible on one page: Review three numbers every Monday: "Live jobs", "PM slots (PMs × 2)", "QS slots (QSs × 3)". Add "Admin apps capacity (admins × 25)" and compare it to "Live jobs × apps per job". In Archdesk, the work-in-progress reporting view surfaces the gap between value claimed and cost-to-date across all live jobs, so the first warning sign isn't a late programme but a WIP gap that grows two weeks running.
Fit-out commercial basics
Your concurrency cap tells you how many live jobs your team can handle. Cash tells you how many you can actually fund. Wages and suppliers don't wait for certification, so the real limit on growth is often your bank balance, not your headcount.
Take a worked example: a £1.2m Cat-B office fit-out in Birmingham on a 12-week programme under a typical JCT sub-contract. You apply monthly, retention is 5%, and you're paid 30 days after the Interim Certificate. The Main Contractor issues a payless notice against your Month 2 application.
-
Start with the job's planned commercial rhythm. You plan to earn £400,000 of value per month (£1.2m over three valuation points at weeks 4, 8, and 12).
Your cash cost burn is £85,000 per week for labour, materials, hoists, waste, and sub-sub-contracts. Over four weeks, that is £340,000 paid out before any money lands.
-
Month 1 creates the hole, even with a "clean" valuation. You apply for £400,000 at week 4. The QS certifies £400,000. Retention is 5% (£20,000), so the net due is £380,000. Payment falls 30 days after certification, so the £380,000 lands in month 2, not month 1. During month 1 you receive £0 and pay out £340,000.
-
Month 2 shows how certification friction turns into a bank problem. You apply for another £400,000 at week 8. The QS certifies £392,000 because £8,000 of ceiling changes aren't backed by signed dayworks and marked-up drawings. Retention on the certified amount is £19,600, so the net due before any payless notice is £372,400.
Then the Main Contractor serves a payless notice for £31,250 citing "missing O&M manuals" and "photo evidence not provided". That reduces the month 2 payment to £341,150. But this payment falls 30 days after certification, so it lands in month 3, not month 2.
The only cash you receive during month 2 is the £380,000 from your month 1 certificate (which was certified at week 4, due 30 days later, landing around week 8). You spend another £340,000 in month 2.
-
Month 3 finishes the work, but cash still lags behind Practical Completion. You apply for the final £400,000 at week 12. The QS certifies £400,000 less £20,000 retention, so £380,000 net. That £380,000 is due 30 days after certification, which means it lands around week 16, four weeks after the programme ends. During month 3, the only cash received is the £341,150 from the month 2 certificate. You pay out another £340,000.
-
See the full timeline. The diagram below maps every key commercial event across weeks 0–16. Each row shows a different activity: when you apply, when the certificate is issued, when a payless notice hits, and when cash actually arrives in your account.
gantt title Cash-flow timeline – £1.2m Cat-B fit-out dateFormat X axisFormat Week %s section Valuations Application 1 (£400k) :milestone, m1a, 4, 0 Application 2 (£400k) :milestone, m2a, 8, 0 Application 3 (£400k) :milestone, m3a, 12, 0 section Certificates Cert 1 issued (£380k net) :milestone, c1, 5, 0 Cert 2 issued (£372.4k net) :milestone, c2, 9, 0 Cert 3 issued (£380k net) :milestone, c3, 13, 0 section Payless notice Payless notice on Cert 2 (−£31,250) :milestone, pn, 10, 0 section Cash received Cert 1 payment lands (£380k) :milestone, p1, 8, 0 Cert 2 payment lands (£341,150) :milestone, p2, 12, 0 Cert 3 payment lands (£380k) :milestone, p3, 16, 0Read this timeline from left to right. Your first application goes in at week 4, but the cash from that certificate doesn't land until week 8. That four-week gap is why month 1 is entirely self-funded. Notice the payless notice at week 10: it knocks £31,250 off your month 2 certificate, and that reduced payment doesn't reach your bank until week 12, the same week the programme ends. Your final certificate payment arrives at week 16, a full month after you've handed over the project.
The table below puts pounds to each of those moments.
Month Certificate settling this month (origin) Cash received in month Cash costs paid in month Net cash movement Cumulative cash position 1 None (no prior certificate) £0 £340,000 -£340,000 -£340,000 2 Month 1 cert: £380,000 £380,000 £340,000 +£40,000 -£300,000 3 Month 2 cert: £341,150 (after payless) £341,150 £340,000 +£1,150 -£298,850 4 (post-PC) Month 3 cert: £380,000 £380,000 £0 +£380,000 +£81,150 Your worst cash position is -£340,000 at the end of month 1. You don't break even until month 4, after the programme has finished and the final certificate settles. The £59,600 retained (£20,000 + £19,600 + £20,000) often sits with the Main Contractor until the Defects Liability Period ends (commonly around 12 months, depending on the contract).
-
Convert the worst point into a buffer target you can plan for. Your lowest point is -£340,000 at end of month 1. At £85,000 per week burn, that is 4.0 weeks of cash you must carry per live job. Run two of these jobs concurrently and you need £680,000 of working capital before either pays a penny.
-
Stop payless notices becoming "normal" with a fixed evidence pack rule. The £31,250 payless notice in month 2 cost you £38,850 of extra cash drag at the point it hurt most (it pushed the month 3 receipt down to £341,150 instead of £372,400, keeping your cumulative position negative for longer). Every application should go in with: dated photos by area, signed dayworks sheets, delivery notes matched to drawing revision, and marked-up drawings showing what is complete. Build the pack weekly. Month-end scramble produces gaps, and gaps get turned into deductions.
5% retention is not the main cash drag on a 12-week fit-out. Timing is. The 30-day payment cycle means you fund month 1 entirely from your own pocket, and the payless notice stretches that funding gap right through to week 16. In Archdesk, each application's payment status tracks against its certificate date and due date, so your forecast updates the moment a payless notice is logged or a certificate value changes. That means the £298,850 cumulative deficit at month 3 shows up in your cash-flow projection the same week, not at the next quarterly board review.
drafting with 3 models in parallel
Price with guardrails
The previous section showed how a single payless notice on a £1.2m Cat-B fit-out can blow your cash-flow gap out to week 16. That's a funding problem on a job you've already won. The bigger mistake is winning a job that was always going to bleed cash, because you never set rules for which tenders deserve your time. Those rules are guardrails. They protect your margin, your cash, and your programme.
Below is a starter table. Edit the numbers to match your own firm's risk appetite and overheads. The point is to have the table agreed before any tender lands, so the decision is mechanical, not emotional.
Guardrail defaults (edit to your firm)
| Risk band | Triggers (if ANY apply, use this band) | Minimum gross margin |
|---|---|---|
| Low | Repeat client, no design responsibility, single-phase handover, standard hours, ≥10% programme float | 18% |
| Medium | New client OR restricted access (e.g. live building, limited goods lift) OR float between 7–10% | 22% |
| High | Weekend or out-of-hours working OR phased handover OR allowances (PC Sums + Provisional Sums) above 15% of contract value | 25% |
| Very high | Design responsibility sits with you OR float below 7% OR two or more "High" triggers combine | 28%+ |
A quick note on terms. Gross margin is revenue minus direct costs (labour, materials, sub-contractors, plant), expressed as a percentage of revenue. PC Sums (Prime Cost Sums) are allowances for materials or goods where the final supplier or product hasn't been chosen yet. Provisional Sums are allowances for work that hasn't been fully designed or scoped. Float is spare time built into a programme to absorb delays without moving the completion date.
Try this: A Main Contractor invites you to tender a Cat B office fit-out in Manchester for £900,000 under JCT Design and Build. The programme is 10 weeks. Working hours are 08:00 to 18:00 Monday to Friday, plus weekend working for noisy trades. The Employer wants a phased handover: Level 3 at week 8, then Levels 1 and 2 at week 10. Design responsibility sits with you. The programme shows 0.5 weeks of float.
| Input | Given |
|---|---|
| Contract sum | £900,000 |
| Programme | 10 weeks |
| Float | 0.5 weeks |
| PC Sums | £85,000 lighting, £40,000 floor finishes, £25,000 ironmongery |
| Provisional Sums | £60,000 extra M&E diversions, £35,000 structural openings |
| Risk flags | Weekend working, phased handover, design responsibility |
Run three checks using the guardrail table above. First, pick the right risk band and its minimum margin. Second, add up all allowances (PC Sums + Provisional Sums) and check if they stay under 15% of the contract sum. Third, check float is at least 10% of the programme duration. Then give one answer: bid as issued, qualify, or walk away.
Show the worked solution
1) Minimum margin band
Design responsibility alone puts you in the "Very high" band. Weekend working and phased handover stack on top. Minimum gross margin = 28%.
2) Scope-risk limit: allowances under 15%?
PC Sums: £85,000 + £40,000 + £25,000 = £150,000.
Provisional Sums: £60,000 + £35,000 = £95,000.
Total allowances: £150,000 + £95,000 = £245,000.
As a percentage: £245,000 ÷ £900,000 = 27.2%.
That breaches the 15% cap. Over a quarter of this job is priced on guesses. You'll end up arguing about what each allowance "covered", and you'll carry prelims (your site running costs, things like management, welfare, skips) while those arguments drag on.
3) Time-risk limit: float at least 10%?
10% of 10 weeks = 1.0 week minimum float. You have 0.5 weeks. One late sign-off from the Employer eats that. Then you're funding weekend acceleration out of your own margin.
Decision
Walk away as issued, or submit a qualified tender only if the Main Contractor accepts these conditions in writing:
- Margin: Price at 28% minimum gross margin.
- Scope: Reduce allowances to under 15% by fixing lighting, flooring, and ironmongery selections now, and defining the M&E diversions and structural openings as measured, priced scope rather than Provisional Sums.
- Programme: Increase float to 1.0 week, or remove the phased handover so you don't stack trades on Level 3 while finishing Levels 1 and 2.
Log these three checks as a gate in your bid management workflow so no estimator can push a tender through that breaks your own rules.
What most people get wrong: they cut margin to win and plan to recover it through variations (changes to the original scope that you claim as extra cost). Heavy allowances block that recovery. The Main Contractor may argue many changes were "within the allowance", so the variation may not be paid, or may be delayed and only partially agreed.
Go/no-go checklist
Run through these ten items on every tender before you commit estimating time. If you can't tick at least eight, either qualify the tender with written assumptions or walk away.
| ✓ | Check | What you're looking for |
|---|---|---|
| ☐ | Risk band identified | You've matched the tender to a band in your guardrail table |
| ☐ | Minimum margin set | The estimator knows the floor margin before pricing starts |
| ☐ | Allowances under 15% | PC Sums + Provisional Sums total less than 15% of contract sum |
| ☐ | Float at least 10% | Programme float ≥ 10% of total programme duration |
| ☐ | Payment terms acceptable | Valuations monthly, payment within 30 days |
| ☐ | Retention capped | Aim for 3% or less, with half released at Practical Completion (where contract terms allow) |
| ☐ | Design responsibility clear | You know exactly which elements you are designing, and your PI insurance covers them |
| ☐ | Out-of-hours costed | Weekend or night working is priced as a separate prelim line, not buried in rates |
| ☐ | Phasing impact reviewed | Phased handover has been programme-tested for trade stacking and double-mobilisation |
| ☐ | Access constraints logged | Goods lift, loading bay, and storage limits are stated in the tender clarifications |
Print this list. Pin it above the estimator's desk. The fastest way to protect margin at £5m turnover, and still protect it at £15m, is to say no to the wrong jobs before you spend a week pricing them.
Run weekly delivery control
Your tender guardrails stop bad work getting in. Weekly control stops good work turning bad once you hit your concurrency limit.
Situation
A 40-strong commercial fit-out contractor in the North West, £5.5m turnover, mostly Cat A and Cat B refurb for Main Contractors under JCT Design and Build sub-contracts. One QS, one contracts administrator, and two working foremen.
They won three jobs inside six weeks: £900k in Manchester (10-week programme), £650k in Leeds (8 weeks), and £420k in Liverpool (6 weeks). The constraint was not site supervision. It was commercial conversion. Site decisions were not turning into notified variations and properly evidenced applications.
What happened
Week 2 on the Manchester job, the ceiling grid changed on Level 3 after the lighting layout moved. The foreman pushed it through to hold the programme. Nobody issued a variation notice for 9 days. The "instruction" lived as a phone call and a marked-up print in a van.
Week 4, the first valuation went in at £260k. The Main Contractor certified £210k. The missing £50k was "no backup": no dated photos, no delivery tickets, no marked-up drawings, no diary notes tying work to an instruction.
Week 5, Leeds hit a clash between the existing fire alarm and new partitions. Two RFIs sat unanswered for a week. Drylining stacked up and weekend working was agreed verbally. The foreman booked 96 extra labour hours to catch up, but those hours had no commercial home. They were not tied to a notified variation or a programme instruction.
Week 6, the MD was staring at a cash squeeze. Wages and suppliers were due, but roughly £140k of earned value was sitting as WIP (work in progress, meaning value earned but not yet certified) because the paperwork wasn't there. The instinct was to hire another supervisor. The real issue was simpler: nobody owned the weekly handover from site facts to commercial paperwork.
The fix: a 45-minute weekly control meeting
They locked in one meeting per live job every Tuesday at 08:00, with a fixed agenda and a timer. The routine did the heavy lifting, not heroics at month end.
Step-by-step: from site fact to variation notice within 48 hours
The meeting only works if site teams capture the raw evidence first. Here is the exact sequence they followed, from the moment something changes on site to an issued notice.
| Step | Who | When | What to capture / issue |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Log the event on site | Foreman | Same day | Daily diary entry naming the change, the person who instructed it (verbal or written), and the area affected. Dated photos of the area before and after. Any marked-up drawing, even a phone photo of a print with a highlighter mark. |
| 2. Collect supporting documents | Foreman | By Friday close | Delivery tickets for extra materials. Timesheet entries showing additional labour hours, broken down by operative and trade. Any email, WhatsApp message, or meeting minute that confirms the instruction. |
| 3. Issue the variation notice | QS | Within 48 hours of the event | A one-page notice referencing the relevant sub-contract clause (often JCT DB Sub clause 2.14, but it varies), describing the instruction, stating the programme impact, and noting "price to follow" if the value is not yet agreed. Sent to the Main Contractor's contract administrator by email with read receipt. |
| 4. Price the variation | QS | Within 7 days of notice | Build the price from first principles: labour hours × agreed daywork rates, material quantities × invoiced unit costs, plant hire if applicable. Cross-reference each line to the diary entry, photos, and delivery tickets from Steps 1-2. Submit as a costed variation submission with the evidence pack attached. |
What goes into the evidence pack
Every variation submission and every valuation line over £2,000 got the same evidence folder. The QS printed this checklist on the inside cover:
- Dated site photos (minimum two: before condition, completed work)
- Daily diary extract naming the instruction source and date
- Marked-up drawing showing the changed scope, overlaid on the contract drawing
- Timesheet extracts for the operatives involved, signed by the foreman
- Material delivery tickets or supplier invoices
- The variation notice itself, with proof of issue (email timestamp)
- A one-page pricing build-up: labour, materials, plant, each line with a rate source (BoQ rate, agreed daywork schedule, or supplier quote)
Example output: the ceiling grid variation
The Manchester ceiling grid change was the test case. The foreman logged the diary entry on Day 1 of the fix (9 days late, but the new rule started here). He photographed the revised layout against the original reflected ceiling plan. The QS issued a variation notice within 24 hours citing JCT DB Sub clause 2.14, describing the lighting layout revision as the cause, and noting "price to follow within 5 working days."
The costed submission came in at £4,820: 38 additional labour hours at the agreed daywork rate of £42/hr (£1,596), revised ceiling grid materials at £2,740 (supported by a supplier invoice), and 2 days of scaffold tower hire at £242/day (£484). Each line cross-referenced a diary entry, a photo, and a delivery ticket. The Main Contractor agreed £4,650 within 10 days. Under the old approach, this would have surfaced at month end as an unexplained cost line with no recovery route.
The weekly meeting agenda that ties it together
The agenda ran to 45 minutes with a timer. 10 minutes: programme look-ahead for the next two weeks. 10 minutes: labour hours versus tender allowance, flagging any trade where actuals exceed the budget by more than 10%. 10 minutes: RFI and variation log review, checking every open item has a notice issued or a response chased. 10 minutes: next valuation pack assembly, confirming which evidence folders are complete and which need chasing. 5 minutes: three actions maximum, each with an owner and a deadline.
Two rules changed the outcome inside 30 days. No variation sat un-notified for more than 48 hours, even if the price was "TBC". No valuation went in without the evidence checklist completed for each line over £2,000. Foremen owned evidence capture by Friday close using site diary and photo forms. The QS owned conversion by Tuesday close: notices issued, variation prices built, and the application drafted from a live evidence folder.
The result
Month 2 on Manchester, the application went in at £310k and certified at £295k, a 95% conversion rate, because the backup was there. Leeds recovered the weekend working as a variation because the 96 extra hours were tied to a dated instruction and a clear cause. In Archdesk, this weekly rhythm is anchored by the labour cost tracking and WIP reporting views, so the labour spike and the £140k WIP gap show up in-week, not at month end when the damage is already baked in.
90-day scale plan
A checklist of good habits is not a plan. A plan has dates, numbers, and checkpoints that tell you whether you're on track or drifting. Below is a week-by-week template you can adapt to your own firm, followed by a worked example for a Cat A/B fit-out contractor scaling from £5m to £10m turnover.
90-day plan template: four tracks, weekly checkpoints
| Week | Pipeline | Concurrency | Hiring | Cash protection |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | Audit live pipeline. Count qualified opportunities by value. Calculate cover ratio (pipeline value ÷ 12-month turnover target). | List every live project. Record PM and QS loading per job. Set your concurrency cap at 2 jobs per PM. | Name the constraining role (PM, QS, or working foreman). Write the job spec. Brief your recruiter or network. | Pull cash position. List every outstanding Interim Certificate (the payment notice your client issues after a valuation) by age. Calculate weeks of overhead cover. |
| 3–4 | Activate three lead sources. Set a weekly target for new qualified enquiries (e.g. two per week at £300k+ each). | Run first weekly operating meeting: four numbers only (see checklist below). Confirm stop rules in writing. | Shortlist candidates or begin internal training for the constraining role. | Chase every certificate older than 5 days past due date. Set up a rolling 13-week cash forecast updated weekly. |
| 5–8 | Pipeline cover should hit 2.5x (interim milestone on the way to 3x by Week 12). If below, increase outbound activity or add a fourth lead source. | Test stop rules: if valuations went in late on two or more jobs, freeze new project starts until cleared. | Make the hire. First day on site or in the commercial team by Week 8. Name who onboards them in week one. | Cash buffer target: 6 weeks of overhead. If below 4 weeks, defer the next tender submission until cash recovers. |
| 9–12 | Pipeline cover at 3x or above. Win rate producing enough new starts to fill capacity freed by completions. | Review PM loading. If any PM is above 2 live jobs, trigger the next hire decision immediately. | New hire delivering independently on at least one project. If not, extend their supervised period and delay the next start. | Retention exposure mapped per project. Variations (changes to the agreed scope or price) notified in writing within 48 hours on 90%+ of jobs. Valuation submission hit rate at 95%. |
Worked example: Cat A/B fit-out contractor, £5m to £10m
Take a commercial fit-out firm currently running £5m across three live Cat A/B projects (Cat A is the base build finish; Cat B is the tenant-specific fit-out). The team is one PM, one QS, and a contracts administrator. The target is £10m within 12 months.
- Pipeline, Week 2: Current pipeline is £9m (1.8x cover against £5m). Target pipeline for £10m turnover is £30m. Gap: £21m of qualified opportunities over 90 days, roughly £1.6m of new enquiries per week.
- Concurrency, Week 4: The PM is running three jobs. The cap is 2 jobs per PM before valuations (monthly assessments of work done) start slipping. The PM drops to two. The third job gets a temporary site lead reporting to the PM until the new hire arrives.
- Hiring, Week 8: Second PM starts. Onboarded by the existing PM on the simplest live job for two weeks. By Week 10 they take that job plus one new start. Total capacity rises to four concurrent projects across two PMs.
- Cash, Week 6: Overhead burn is £22k per week. Cash balance is £110k, giving 5.0 weeks of cover. Target is 6 weeks (£132k). The £22k gap closes if one outstanding certificate of £34k is chased and paid within 14 days. If it isn't paid, no new tender goes out that fortnight.
Action checklist
- Set pipeline cover at 3x by Week 12. A £10m turnover plan needs £30m of live, qualified opportunities. Measure cover ratio every Friday.
- Cap concurrency at 2 live jobs per PM. Freeze new starts if any PM exceeds this or if valuations go in late twice running.
- Start the constraining hire by Week 8. Name who onboards them in their first week. If the new hire isn't delivering independently by Week 12, delay the next project start.
- Maintain a cash buffer of 6 weeks' overhead. If the buffer drops below 4 weeks, defer the next tender submission until cash recovers.
- Submit valuations on the due date on 95% of jobs. Notify variations in writing within 48 hours on 90%+ of jobs. Track both weekly. In Archdesk, certificate and retention tracking updates the same day a valuation is entered, so the cash buffer figure stays current rather than waiting for a month-end spreadsheet.
- Run a fixed 45-minute weekly meeting with four numbers: valuation submitted (yes/no), certificate received (yes/no), variations notified this week, and next 14-day programme risk.
- Approve personally: any new client type, any tender below your margin floor, any payless notice response, and any programme recovery plan longer than two weeks.
What to learn next
- Cash forecasting by certificate and due date, because a job can show profit on paper while cash goes negative once certification slips by even a fortnight.
- Variation evidence packs, because a 48-hour notice without proof still ends as "not agreed". Build a minimum pack that site staff can produce in 15 minutes.
- Close-out and final account control, because phased handovers and snagging (the process of identifying and fixing defects before handover) decide Practical Completion dates and retention release.
£10m turnover changes your job. You stop running every project and start protecting cash and margin across four to six live sites while other people handle the day-to-day. Pin the four-track plan to the wall, check the checkpoint numbers every Friday, and growth stays predictable instead of turning into valuation chasing and weekend firefighting.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much pipeline coverage does a fit-out contractor need to grow from £5m to £15m turnover?
You need roughly 3x pipeline coverage against your target revenue. That means £45m of live, qualified opportunities if you're aiming for £15m. Most fit-out firms that stall at £5m to £8m don't have a pricing problem. They have a pipeline problem, with too few qualified leads entering the top of the funnel each week.
How many live fit-out projects can a single QS manage before margin starts leaking?
One QS can typically manage five to seven live Cat A or Cat B projects before applications start slipping and variations go unrecorded. Your maximum live project count is always the lowest of three separate caps: QS capacity, site supervision headcount, and cash headroom. Hit any one of those limits and you need to stop taking work or hire ahead of the next project start.
What is the typical cash funding gap on a £1.2m JCT sub-contract fit-out project?
On a 12-week Cat B office fit-out under a standard JCT sub-contract with monthly applications, 5% retention, and 30-day payment terms, the peak funding gap sits close to £300,000. That gap exists because you pay wages weekly and suppliers on 30-day terms, but you won't see your first certified payment until week 8 or 9. Cash kills more growing fit-out firms than bad pricing does.
What tender guardrails should a fit-out contractor use to protect margin during rapid growth?
Set hard rules before you open a tender. Minimum gross margin (typically 18% to 22% for Cat B), maximum single-project value as a percentage of turnover (no more than 25%), confirmed payment terms no worse than 30 days from Interim Certificate, and a retention cap of 5%. If a tender fails any one of those guardrails, decline it. Easy turnover that breaks your cash flow or margin rules is more expensive than no turnover at all.
How often should a growing fit-out contractor review cost-to-complete on live projects?
Weekly, not monthly. Firms that track cost-to-complete every week finish roughly 20% to 30% closer to their tendered margin than those reviewing monthly. The real benefit isn't the report itself. It's that site teams and subcontractors stop burying problems when they know overspends will surface within days.
When should a fit-out firm scaling to £15m hire its second QS or contracts administrator?
Set a hiring trigger point tied to your concurrency limit, not your turnover. A common trigger is when you reach four live projects with a single QS, or when your contracts administrator is handling more than six active sub-contracts. Hire before the trigger fires, not after. Late hiring is the single biggest cause of commercial slippage in fit-out firms growing past £8m.
What does a realistic 90-day growth plan look like for a fit-out contractor?
Split the 90 days into four parallel tracks with weekly checkpoints: pipeline build, concurrency and capacity planning, hiring, and financial controls. Each track has specific numbers attached, such as target qualified leads per week, maximum live sites per QS, and cash headroom per project. A plan without dates, numbers, and checkpoints is just a list of good intentions.
What is the most common mistake fit-out contractors make when scaling past £5m turnover?
Taking on more projects than their commercial and site teams can control. A firm at £5m with one QS and two foremen that wins £3m of new work in a quarter will lose more margin on existing jobs than it gains on the new ones. Growth without matching your QS capacity, supervision headcount, and cash reserves to each new project start is the fastest way to turn a profitable business into a loss-making one.


































